PCPartPicker

  • Log In
  • Register

Build

My Racing Rig

by DucMan888

19
30 Comments

Details

Date Published

May 10, 2016

Date Built

May 9, 2016

CPU Clock Rate

3.5 GHz

GPU Core Clock Rate

1.114 GHz

GPU Effective Memory Clock Rate

7.01 GHz

GPU Temperature Under Load

64.0° C

Description

This rig was built to replace a ‘gaming’ laptop, which replaced the XBOX 360, which replaced the Playstation 3, which replaced the original XBOX in search of racing sims. If only I took the money spent up to this point and went with a PC initially I could be launching rockets from my backyard right now, but I digress. The goal was to build a system that would allow max settings with a single 1080p 60Hz monitor and keep it under $1,000 USD. I wanted to achieve a balanced system that has room for growth, if needed, and not compromise on quality for each component. With the resources available like Tom’s Hardware, dozens of videos on YouTube from manufacturers, along with PCPicker and the PCP community, were essential to the decisions I made. I am a bit more educated in technology than when I started and am appreciative of all mentioned. All costs are after incentives and do not include taxes or shipping.

Check out my review of the build video here

Assetto Corsa gameplay here

F1 2013 gameplay here

iRacing gameplay here

Project CARS gameplay here

Raceroom Racing Experience gameplay here

rFactor 2 gameplay here

Automobilista gameplay here

Optical Drive Conversion Kit- An Icy Dock 2.5” to 5.25” I removed the HDD/SSD cage for improved air flow and added a lower front fan. Conversion kit was installed in one of the two optical drive bays for the SSD. I am not installing any optical drives, readers, etc.

I gave everything 5 stars as install went smoothly and no conflicts with drivers. The exception was the additional case fan as noted. Other than that a very satisfying build.

*Revised 5/25/16: Ran benchmarks using Extreme HD settings for both the laptop and the racing rig. The racing rig has achieved the goal of max setting at 60fps (59.1 to be exact) 3x's that of the laptop. I initially set the OC of the CPU at 100Mhz less than the max achieved using the Asus AI Tweaker of 4.6Ghz. I am now going to de-clock the processor and run tests again until I get to a point where the frame rate dips lower than the 59.1fps and then maintain the CPU clock speed at the level as to not run it harder than is required. The monitor is a 60Hz 42" Plasma, so if my understanding is correct sending any additional fps is not being utilized.

*Revised 9/5/16: A second PNY CS1311 480 GB SSD was installed and used as the drive for games only. The installation and set up was simple and quick as was the moving the Steam application. Since the last revision I learned from CXC Simulations in a joint interview with a Project CARS 2 developer that overclocking the CPU may negatively affect the hardware experience as it interacts with the physics of the application/game/sim. I have since de-clocked the CPU back to stock 3.5 Ghz and have not have experienced any negative effect in performance.

*Revised 3/8/2017: Built a TV stand to bring the TV lower and closer to the driving position from original as seen in the first two photos. Check out the video for some useful information I gathered to come to this change. Racing Rig Monitor Positioning Video Here

*Revised 7/13/2017: Replaced TV with three Acer GN276HL 27", 144Hz, 1080p, 1ms monitors mounted to a Seneca SD13 stand. Triple monitor setup video here

Part Reviews

CPU

From what I understand the majority of games do not use hyper threading and as being a dedicated gaming PC and no professional video, photo, or music editing being done the i5 seemed like the best value. With overclocking available this CPU should give the system room to grow. Used the install tool from Asus to ensure proper fit to motherboard.

OC to 4.5Ghz 5/17/2016

CPU Cooler

Established component, great reviews, best value. Easy install, watch video on install as printed instructions are a bit vague.

Motherboard

Great reviews along with the PCDIY channel on YouTube really sold me on Asus. The dedication to making the UEFI user friendly for even a novice like me is assuring. Overclocking will allow me to tweak the system for more performance if needed, or if I just want to geek it up a bit. A more experienced PC builder may want to go with the ROG series, but in comparison and with my experience this made the most sense.

Memory

Using the Qualified Vendor List (QVL) from Asus along with the G. Skill configurator I was confident this memory would not have a compatibility issue. Having the Intel eXtreme Memory Profile (XMP) will ensure top performance from the RAM. Looks good too.

Storage

550 MBps / 520 MBps Read/Write, and up to 87,000 IOPS in 4k random read compares well with others costing significantly more. This will be the only drive for now and should be sufficient for Windows 10 and the three or four games. If required, the case, Mobo and PSU are capable of adding more, and by then the cost of larger SSD’s should also be less expensive, perhaps even a M.2.

Video Card

As with the motherboard, Asus breathes confidence into the build with this GPU. Solid functionality with the ability to OC with native software is important. Thoroughly tested overclocking by Asus gave me confidence I could get a well performing system that is stable. As with the AI Tweaker, the GPU Tweak II software has a robust platform for more advanced users.

Case

A 'budget' case (cheap I guess) is the description I saw most often used for this case, but I like the airflow and the industrial look.

Power Supply

A fully modular unit for cable management, a larger capacity to ensure consistent power and upgrade ability for other components, and a Gold Plus rating was key.

Wireless Network Adapter

One of the few that had a magnetic, free standing antenna. Handles both 2.4 and 5.0 Ghz and max speed ratings exceed what is currently available in my area by a bunch.

Case Fan

The connecting cable is very short so had to flip with the upper front fan for better cable management, also clear blades on the fan would have enhanced the LED effect . Honestly though, it was cheap and it works fine.

Monitor

The quality and clarity is what I noticed first and foremost when looking at the digital display from the in cockpit view when racing, the numbers are easily read at a glance. I am by no means a TV/Monitor expert and typically don't tweak with settings and fortunately this monitor looked fantastic to me straight out of the box and that's where I have left it.

If I had a gripe it is the connections being VGA, DVI and HDMI, for this monitor to obtain the 144Hz a native DVI to DVI connection is required without adapters. The the HDMI is capable of only 60Hz and the VGA...well is VGA.

Comments Sorted by:

joelhowell 5 points 35 months ago

That's right Xbox and crap gaming alienware peice of sh!t laptops.

WE DO THE PCMASSA RACE HERE AND ONLY HERE, YOU WILL NEVER BE DOPE +1

WombatRider 11 Builds 2 points 35 months ago

Really nice build. You balanced the parts out very well, and the cable management looks great. Enjoy your new computer! +1

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 1 point 35 months ago

Thank you WombatRider

Ropota 2 points 35 months ago

PSSSSSSSStttt Pascal comes out in a month.....return and get the 1070 for the same price or forever kick yourself for not waiting.

Kaisen 1 point 35 months ago

I mean the Reference Card will be 450 dollars, so I expect the 1070 to be 350-400 for MSRP? Either way that'd sort of blow his $1000 budget but otherwise I agree with you.

creedman7 16 Builds 2 points 35 months ago

I agree. I thought the 1070 was going to upwards of $400, and DucMan888 got his Asus GeForce GTX 970 for sub $300.

Selicos 3 points 35 months ago

Which is solid, especially if the OP can max his games with the 970 at the settings they want.

Ropota 1 point 35 months ago

the reference is $450 and the after market is $350. That extra $50 is worth it. the 1070 is faster than a titan x lol. He cant even sli a 970 for the same performance.

Selicos 1 point 35 months ago

In demonstrated VR scenarios faster than a Titan X. Benchmarks will be available about May 17th. Actual performance boost may be about 25% over past generation.

Ropota 1 point 35 months ago

uhhhh that's not what was said during the press conference. They had rise of the tomb raider and the division 1440p 60 fps with ease maxed out on every single graphic option. but benchmarks will be the deciding factor for most, as it should.

Selicos 1 point 35 months ago

Yes, Nvidia at a hype conference paraded massive improvement. When the gag on reviews lifts on the 17th we can see how the new cards actually perform in real world common tests.

EngageDynamo 1 point 35 months ago

Reference was always more expensive... It was always sold by Nvidia for people who want it the way Nvidia designed it, and there will obviously be cards cheaper and better for the 1070 line up, and Nvidia already admits this.

Kaisen 1 point 35 months ago

I mean I've only seen HWC's video on the 1080 benchmarks, but apparently Nvidia's founders card is actually setting the cap for MSRP prices, rather than the base, which seems to have been the trend among Maxwell cards and before that.

HWC Video: https://youtu.be/bH-Ju9OPtFY

[comment deleted]
NeonThought 4 Builds 2 points 35 months ago

Looks like a great budget rig. I just wonder if you'll have enough storage space though. I only say this cuz I have Fallout 4 eating up a solid portion of my hard drive.

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 2 points 35 months ago

Thank you NeonThought, I loaded up iRacing, rFactor2, and Race Room Racing Experience and still have 150 GB left. I hope that someday I will need a new drive as that will mean some good racing sims have come out.

Dalton334 0 points 35 months ago

Shut up. Shut up. Shut up. $1000 is not budget.

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 4 points 35 months ago

Dalton334 ,A budget is a quantitative expression of a plan for a defined period of time. Perhaps what you meant was inexpensive build.

NeonThought 4 Builds 2 points 35 months ago

Not for most, but I see people drop 2 or 3 grand on a steel bomb and they won't perform much better than this.

creedman7 16 Builds 2 points 35 months ago

Very nice build, great cable management. I've got a similar build ( not on pcpp yet ). For the price to performance the i5-6600k is way to go. Back when I bought my i5, the i7 was $100 OVER retail, I couldn't justify paying crazy money on it. The i5 chews through game when paired with 16gb of ram and 970 card. The i5 also overclocks pretty nice. I don't notice not having the hyper threading, even doing some video editing. Great job for the $1000 range.

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 1 point 35 months ago

Thank you creedman7

speedypig101 1 Build 2 points 35 months ago

Cool, kind of similar price range as my recent build (https://pcpartpicker.com/b/33r7YJ) using a i5 6600k, gtx 970, corsair PSU and Case, and SSD. I am interested to hear why you choose an ASUS card, though (spoiler alert: MSI cards overclock better). I understand the RAM choice (great deal btw), but I will always be a HyperX Fury fanboy for the insane auto OC'ing, and the awesome looks. Overall, great balance of performance and quality!

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 1 point 35 months ago

Thank you speedypig101, the MSI was also a consideration. Asus with the PCDIY YouTube videos made me lean more towards them.

speedypig101 1 Build 1 point 35 months ago

Oh ok ;) I do thing that asus has very good customer support ;)

photocyborg 2 points 35 months ago

All console freaks need to read this description lol.

Viveycore 2 points 23 months ago

Wow just wow +1 for just the chair Awesome build

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 1 point 21 months ago

Thank you. It has been fun piecing it together and now I am contemplating a triple monitor :)

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 1 point 12 months ago

Recently added a triple monitor set up and still getting 60+ fps with no issues. Getting close to two years and with Raceroom Racing Experience have over 375 hours logged and no need for any further updates at this time. Triple Monitor Review

MasterShock 1 point 35 months ago

nice build but you shoud've have waited for pascal

DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 1 point 35 months ago

Thanks, but I think the 970 will suffice as racing sims really haven't got to the point of some other more popular games for taxing a system.

[comment deleted]
DucMan888 submitter 1 Build 1 point 35 months ago

Thanks jmac, no issues at all, there is about 1/2" clearance from the side panel.